Why you need "cross-origin isolated" for powerful features

Published: May 4, 2020

In Making your website "cross-origin isolated" using COOP and COEP we explained how to adopt to "cross-origin isolated" state using COOP and COEP. This is a companion article that explains why cross-origin isolation is required to enable powerful features on the browser.

Glossary

This document uses many similarly named and abbreviated terminology. To clarify, we've curated a mini glossary:

Background

The web is built on the same-origin policy, a security feature that restricts how documents and scripts can interact with resources from another origin. This principle restricts the ways websites can access cross-origin resources. For example, a document from https://a.example is prevented from accessing data hosted at https://b.example.

However, the same-origin policy has had some historical exceptions. Any website can:

  • Embed cross-origin iframes
  • Include cross-origin resources such as images or scripts
  • Open cross-origin dialog windows with a DOM reference

By the time the web community realized the benefits of a strict same-origin policy, the web already relyied on these exceptions.

The security side-effects of such a lax same-origin policy were patched in two ways:

  • The Cross Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) protocol makes sure that the server allows sharing a resource with a given origin.
  • Developers implicitly remove direct script access to cross-origin resources, while preserving backward compatibility. Such cross-origin resources are called "opaque" resources. This is why cross-origin pixel manipulation with CanvasRenderingContext2D fails unless CORS is applied to the image.

All of these policy decisions are happening within a browsing context group.

The Browsing Context Group includes the primary site and assets from the embedded site.

For a long time, this combination was enough to keep browsers safe, with limited edge cases that needed direct patching (such as JSON vulnerabilities).

This changed with Spectre, which makes any data that is loaded to the same browsing context group as your code potentially readable. By measuring the time certain operations take, attackers can guess the contents of the CPU caches, and therefore the contents of the process' memory. Such attacks are possible with low-granularity timers that exist in the platform, and can be sped up with high-granularity timers, both explicit (such as performance.now()) and implicit (such as SharedArrayBuffers).

If evil.com embeds a cross-origin image, they can use a Spectre attack to read the embbed image's pixel data. This renders protections that rely on "opaqueness" ineffective.

Evil.com is the main website, attacking the embedded b.example iframe and images by using Spectre.

Ideally, all cross-origin requests are vetted by the server that owns the resource. If vetting wasn't performed, then the data should never makes it to the browsing context group of an evil actor. Thus, the data stays out of reach of possible Spectre attacks. We call this a cross-origin isolated state.

When the embedded code is in a cross-origin isolated state, the requesting site is considered less dangerous. This allows for the requesting site to use SharedArrayBuffer, performance.measureUserAgentSpecificMemory() and high resolution timers with better precision, while preventing possible Spectre attacks. This state also prevents modifying document.domain.

Cross Origin Embedder Policy

Cross Origin Embedder Policy (COEP) prevents a document from loading any cross-origin resources that don't explicitly grant the document permission with CORP or CORS. With this feature, you can declare that a document cannot load such resources.

A diagram of which embedded assets are allowed and disallowed, thanks to CORP policies.
The parent site, a.example, set the COEP policy to require-corp. a.example wants to embed 3 assets from b.example, but only two are successful. The two successful embeds include a JavaScript file with a cross-origin CORP policy and an image with CORS allowed. The third asset is a video that has a CORP policy that requires the asset be embedded on the same-origin only, therefore the video won't be loaded on a.example.

To activate this policy, append the following HTTP header to the document:

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy: require-corp

COEP takes a single value of require-corp. This enforces the policy that the document can only load resources from the same origin, or resources explicitly marked as loadable from another origin.

For resources to be loadable from another origin, they need to support either Cross Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) or Cross Origin Resource Policy (CORP).

Cross Origin Resource Sharing

If a cross origin resource supports Cross Origin Resource Sharing (CORS), you may use the crossorigin attribute to load it to your web page without being blocked by COEP.

<img src="https://third-party.example.com/image.jpg" crossorigin>

For example, if this image resource is served with CORS headers, use the crossorigin attribute so that the request to fetch the resource will use CORS mode. This also prevents the image from being loaded unless it sets CORS headers.

Similarly, you may fetch cross origin data through the fetch() method, which doesn't require special handling as long as the server responds with the right HTTP headers.

Cross Origin Resource Policy

Cross Origin Resource Policy (CORP) was originally introduced as an opt-in to protect your resources from being loaded by another origin. In the context of COEP, CORP can specify the resource owner's policy for who can load a resource.

The Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy header takes three possible values:

Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy: same-site

Resources that are marked same-site can only be loaded from the same site.

Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy: same-origin

Resources that are marked same-origin can only be loaded from the same origin.

Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy: cross-origin

Resources that are marked cross-origin can be loaded by any website. (This value was added to the CORP spec along with COEP.)

Cross Origin Opener Policy

Cross Origin Opener Policy (COOP) lets you isolate a top-level window from other documents, by putting the documents in a separate browsing context group. This way, the documents cannot directly interact with the top-level window. For example, if a document with COOP opens a dialog, its window.opener property is null. The .closed property of the opener's reference is true.

a.example could not open b.example in a dialog.

The Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header takes three possible values:

Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy: same-origin

Documents that are marked same-origin can share the same browsing context group with same-origin documents that are also explicitly marked same-origin.

Drawing depicting window able to interact with 'same-origin' popup that's in the same Browsing Context Group, but not one labeled as 'same-origin' while still outside of the Browsing Context Group.

Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy: same-origin-allow-popups

A top-level document with same-origin-allow-popups retains references to any of its popups which either don't set COOP or which opt out of isolation by setting a COOP of unsafe-none.

COOP

Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy: unsafe-none

unsafe-none is the default and allows the document to be added to its opener's browsing context group unless the opener itself has a COOP of same-origin.

Summary

If you want access to features like SharedArrayBuffer, performance.measureUserAgentSpecificMemory(), or high resolution timers with better precision, your document needs to use both COEP with the value of require-corp and COOP with the value of same-origin. In the absence of either, the browser won't guarantee sufficient isolation to safely enable those powerful features. You can determine your page's situation by checking if self.crossOriginIsolated returns true.

Learn how to implement this in Making your website "cross-origin isolated" using COOP and COEP.

Resources